Curriculum Vitae

Universitatea de Medicină și Farmacie Tîrgu-Mureș
Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, Departamentul MD1, Disciplina de Ortodonție
Disciplina de Ortodonție, Profesor universitar

Director Departament MD1, Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, UMF Tîrgu-Mureș 2008 – prezent
Profesor universitar Disciplina de Ortodonție (2014-prezent)
Disciplina de Pedodonție-Ortodonție (2008-2014)
Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, UMF Tîrgu-Mureș
2010 – prezent Conducător de doctorat
2008 – prezent Coordonator rezidenţiat Ortodonţie şi Ortopedie dento-facială
1999 – 2008 Conferenţiar universitar
Disciplina de Pedodonție-Ortodonție
Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, UMF Tîrgu-Mureș
1996 – 1999 Şef de lucrări
Disciplina de Pedodonție-Ortodonție
Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, UMF Tîrgu-Mureș
1992 – 1996 Asistent universitar
Disciplina de Pedodonție-Ortodonție
Facultatea de Medicină Dentară, UMF Tîrgu-Mureș

Lecture

INTERDISCIPLINARY CONEXIONS IN ORTHODONTICS

Orthodontics, as well as other specialties of Dentistry has experienced a permanent evolution in recent years because of performance in radiological investigation techniques (Cone-beam CT, computerized teleradiography) and technological progress and materials market (hybrid arches, autoligatured brackets, anchorage minimplants).
Orthodontic therapy is increasingly requested by a heterogen populational segment, with ages between 5 and 55 years, seeking a quick and effective treatment, with an emphasis on the improvement of facial aesthetics.
The purpose of this conference is to present a synthesis of the most frequent orthodontic intraoperative preprosthetic treatment (molar uprighting, calibration of graps, molar intrusion for a correct occlusal plane), and elements related to the adult patient adherence.
Material and method
The study was realised on a number of 74 adult patients, aged between 23-35, with different types of preprosthetic class and orthodontic treated, by fixed appliances , MBT prescription with great anchorage. The authors have analysed periodontal parameters : IP, IHP,IIG and the distance between the cement-enamel junction CEJ and the apex in order to determine the risk of root resorption. The patients were investigated before starting the orthodontic treatment, at 6 months after applying the fixed apparatus and at the end of orthodontic treatment.
Results
In high cases (81%) the orthodontic treatment doesn’t influence negatively the periodontal parameters .In a few cases (7%), we observed a gingival resorption and 11% of cases had at the end of orthodontic treatment root resorption , especially during molar intrusion.
Conclusions
The collaboration with the prosthetician, and currently using light forces, avoiding movement type jiggling at patients, where growth processes are completed, represents the success factors for decreasing orthodontic risk therapy.
Periodontal analysis and alveolar bone evaluation are very important before orthodontic preprosthetic treatment, especially in cases with thin gingival tissue and endocrine disorders.